samplesoli.blogg.se

1. #MICROSOFT XPS DOCUMENT WRITER WINDOWS 7 PDF#
2. #MICROSOFT XPS DOCUMENT WRITER WINDOWS 7 UPDATE#
3. #MICROSOFT XPS DOCUMENT WRITER WINDOWS 7 DRIVER#
4. #MICROSOFT XPS DOCUMENT WRITER WINDOWS 7 CODE#

let's say we would like to see improvements. The format in XML is clean, but XML and the parsing of XML is yeah. We even heavily considered going back to EMF for this (!!). In general XPS is slow for printing, and producing/consuming XPS files takes up much more disk space and consumes more memory compared to other technologies.

#MICROSOFT XPS DOCUMENT WRITER WINDOWS 7 CODE#

NET Core I expect that this might also be a reason that code base differs or that not everything has been implemented. piece files doesn't seem to be supported in.

#MICROSOFT XPS DOCUMENT WRITER WINDOWS 7 PDF#

first converting it to PDF or just using EMF) the PDF/EMF format is faster, more optimized, takes less disk space (not true for EMF) and doesn't have the annoying STA-requirement like XPS.īecause XPS with. When we further process the XPS (compared to e.g. We believe it is a Microsoft internal thing.

So I don't think I'll be a great help here.

#MICROSOFT XPS DOCUMENT WRITER WINDOWS 7 DRIVER#

the XPS files in a XPS print driver (XPSDrv) is Microsoft internal. We are willing to help but it is hard to say what is exactly slow as the code that parses/generates/.

#MICROSOFT XPS DOCUMENT WRITER WINDOWS 7 UPDATE#

So generally I believe that when the MS team just profiles the code and maybe has some possibilities to update the code base that in terms of performance, memory allocations big steps can be taken for. ±50seconds in sumatra compared to ☖ minutes). Try to search for example something in XPS Viewer and do the same in SumatraPDF (e.g. need some performance boots so that it is faster compared to PDF documents.) Author:Īrea-System.IO.Compression, tenet-performance, yes I mentioned the XPS Viewer I mentioned was just to compare for example XPS Viewer with SumatraPDF (also capable of viewing XPS documents). NET 5 is also slow and takes a lot of memory etc etc.

xps file in Microsoft Xps Viewer, make sure it is on the first page and search for the value 67588 or Zwertvaegher You'll notice the file size is HUGE compared to the PDF file.Print the file to Microsoft XPS Document Writer (sloooooow 🐌 🏁 🕐).navigate to and click on Databank bidprentjes or "Bidprentjes" (direct link to.NET 5 - Printing - XPS requires STA Threads wpf#4000 (or print and capture the XPS print jobs with a render filter to catch the xps on the microsoft generic V4 driver.)Ĭan these XPS printing issues please be tackled or prioritized? I can't share this big file (confidential) but just take some pdf files, ebooks in pdf, with a lot of pages and print them. (to compare: foxit reader on the original pdf does it in 25 seconds). Sumatra finds the word in about 50 seconds, XPS Viewer does it in ☖ minutes. on page 2668) literally takes ages as it processes sequentally through the document. Opening the xps in Microsoft XPS Viewer and searching a word (which exists e.g. When opening the original pdf (3MB) and we print it to the Microsoft XPS Document Writer printer as an. The performance issues can easily be reproduced with Microsoft's own XPS Viewer and Microsoft XPS Document Writer (printer). Eventually we go out of memory as we can't hold all the rendered pages for some actions we are doing. We can't render the pages in parallel (if possible in C#, feel free to explain how), in other words other code and logic that works on individual pages is unable to go parallel and is slow because it all has to go sequentially. Because of the very annoying STA requirement, it takes ages to render the pages sequentally.

Having for example a document of 3000 pages being printed to a V4 driver. As adviced from /runtime/wpf I should open a ticket here for the `` dotnet/runtime team.